Take male chauvinist Dick Masterson. Granted, he's a bit of an extreme example, but he's a perfect example of how bad men's attitudes towards women and, more specifically lesbians, can be.
Watch the video and see for yourself.
What's that? All women are lesbians for attention? HOLD THE PHONE! Am I not right in thinking there are a lot of homophobic women out there who would rather not pass themselves off as homosexual? And more importantly, funnily enough, all the lesbians I know are not doing it for attention, they're doing it because of men like you. (Oh, also the fact that women are hotter and clearly make better conversation than men may have something to do with it.)
For more disgustingly degrading blogs written by Masterson himself, go to http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com to see the full extent of his chauvinistic attitude.
The one that particularly p*ssed me off was this one titled "All Lesbians Are Fakers". Women are all lesbians because they like sex? Women are only in lesbian relationships to have sex?
Maybe I'm wrong, maybe he has been in one or two lesbian relationships... YEAH, RIGHT.
For more disgustingly degrading blogs written by Masterson himself, go to http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com to see the full extent of his chauvinistic attitude.
The one that particularly p*ssed me off was this one titled "All Lesbians Are Fakers". Women are all lesbians because they like sex? Women are only in lesbian relationships to have sex?
Maybe I'm wrong, maybe he has been in one or two lesbian relationships... YEAH, RIGHT.
2 comments:
Ew! That is totally a good enough reason to stay a lesbian! I am glad though that most men (at least all my friends) aren't like this.
PS. Tina & Bette are the perfect example of women's hotness. =)
Aww. He's so sweet in denial.
---
I commented his blog:
"Men are Illegible: Writing is stupid and an ineffective way to communicate."
I'm sorry. Does anyone else get the pure irony sensation when reading this? He's saying writing is stupid... yet he's writing. Does that make him stupid? (Rhetorical.)
And your argument, dick, about the "everything you see, men did" thing - right, just some points:
1. So we'll blame you for rape, and poverty, and injustice.
2. I'm so happy you made so many wonderful machines, I know the O-Zone layer really appreciates it. Thanks for your contribution to global warming, I mean, hey, women couldn't have come up with anything quite as genius as that!
"No religion anywhere has ever put a woman in charge of shit."
So you're not very familiar with religion in its entirety, I see. There are several examples of matriarchal societies still existent in the world. The fact that you don't know about them or, similarly, matriarchal religions, is a strength to their name. They have a low fatality rate, a low poverty rate, and above all, are high in values relating to equality.
It's funny how you're living it a patriarchal society, and you see women as "beneath you", when in working matriarchal societies, women see men as their equals.
"1. Men have penises"
Are you serious? We could easily put "Women don't" or "Women have vaginas". It doesn't win you any points.
But *pat on the back* for your observational skills. It's clear that you've been checking the boys out at shower-time. ;)
And I see why you hardcore chauvinists spell "women" wrong. Whimmen. Ha. Laughable. The alternative spelling is already coined by the feminist movement as "Womyn."
Men never get there first...
Post a Comment